Energy Policy: Save People, Industries from Climate Change Hoax
Man-made global warming is
a fraud. The so-called scientific
“consensus” is a lie, designed to
steamroll governments into adopting
brutal policies that will shut down
farming, manufacturing and energy
industries, and kill millions of people.
Numerous scientists the world
over have publicly disputed the idea
of man-made global warming, yet
they are by-and-large blacked out of
a media blizzard dominated by global
warming entrepreneur Al Gore
and his hand-picked ambassadors,
such as Australia’s Tim Flannery.
Gore, and Flannery, and their many
fellow-thinkers like HRH Prince
Philip and the World Wide Fund for
Nature (WWF), are united by one
agenda: to reduce the world’s human
population. This has been the agenda
of the British Empire’s aristocratic
elite ever since the British East India
Company’s paid employee, Parson
Thomas Malthus, first penned his
great overpopulation lie in 1798, An
Essay on the Principle of Population.
As Abraham Lincoln’s economics
adviser Henry Carey observed,
the British East India Company
invented the lie of overpopulation, as
something on which they could blame
the evils of their economic system
of free trade. Wherever the British
imposed free trade, such as 17th and
18th Century India, mass starvation
ensued, which the British overlords
always blamed on “overpopulation”,
as they continued to extract their
loot.
In 1902, the famous British futurist
author and Fabian Society founder H.G.
Wells advocated population reduction
as a policy in his book, Anticipations
of the Reaction of Mechanical and Scientific
Progress Upon Human Life and
Thought. Wells foreshadowed a world
government (akin to Tim Flannery’s
proposed Commission for Thermostatic
Control) called the “New Republic”:
“And how will the New Republic
treat the inferior races? How
will it deal with the black? How will
it deal with the yellow man? How will
it tackle that alleged termite in the
civilized woodwork, the Jew?... And
for the rest, those swarms of black,
and brown, and dirty-white, and yellow
people, who do not come into
the new needs of efficiency? Well,
the world is a world, not a charitable
institution, and I take it they will have
to go. The whole tenor and meaning
of the world, as I see it, is that they
have to go. So far as they fail to develop
sane, vigorous, and distinctive
personalities for the great world of
the future, it is their portion to die out
and disappear.”
“The new ethics will hold life to be
a privilege and a responsibility, not
a sort of night refuge for base spirits
out of the void; and the alternative in
right conduct between living fully,
beautifully, and efficiently will be
to die. For a multitude of contemptible
and silly creatures, fear-driven
and helpless and useless, unhappy
or hatefully happy in the midst of
squalid dishonour, feeble, ugly, inefficient,
born of unrestrained lusts, and
increasing and multiplying through
sheer incontinence and stupidity, the
men of the New Republic will have
little pity and less benevolence…The
men of the New Republic will not be
squeamish, either, in facing or inflicting
death, because they will have a
fuller sense of the possibilities of life
than we possess. They will have an
ideal that will make killing worth the
while; like Abraham, they will have
the faith to kill, and they will have no
superstitions about death.”
Thanks to the global warming fraud,
Wells’ spiritual heirs among modern
population–reduction advocates have
seized on a way to achieve their
aims—carbon emissions reduction.
The issue with reducing carbon
emissions has nothing to do with the
financial cost; put simply, carbon
dioxide is a natural by-product of
energy consumption, and if energy
consumption is scaled back, people
will die. They will die of starvation;
they will die of poverty-related
diseases from contaminated water,
poor food sanitation etc.; they
will die of otherwise-controllable
natural disasters that could have
been contained by appropriate
infrastructure; and they will die
from extreme heat and from extreme
cold. Those most vulnerable are the
world’s poorest people, in Africa,
India, and China; nations which
have already been told by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change that they have to cut back
on rice production because of its
methane emissions, even though
850 million people in the world face
starvation.
Energy Policy
The Citizens Electoral Council
will stop any measures to reduce
energy consumption, whether they
are in the form of carbon taxes,
emissions trading schemes, or government
regulations, such as limits
on land-clearing for agriculture.
Existing measures to treat carbon
dioxide as a pollutant, and to reduce
energy consumption will be
reversed. Australia will withdraw
from the Kyoto Protocol, and any
further international climate change
conventions.
The CEC will develop an energy
policy for Australia, which emphasises
the rapid adoption of the new
energy sources that are genuine
technological advances on existing
sources, as measured by energy
density. Whereas solar and wind
power are backward leaps from
oil and coal, being of a far inferior
energy density, nuclear fission and
in the future nuclear fusion will be
giant technological leaps forward.
In terms of energy density, one cup
of uranium, is the equivalent of a
mountain of coal.
Energy Density for various sources
|
Megawatts per square metre |
Solar–biomass |
.0000001 |
Solar–Earth surface |
.0002 |
Solar–near-Earth orbit |
.001 |
Fossil |
10.0 |
Fission |
50.0 to 200.0 |
Fusion |
trillions |
Australia is excellently-positioned
to take advantage of the nuclear
revolution: we have over one-third
of the world’s easily-mined uranium,
and more importantly, have
the world’s largest deposits of thorium,
which has the benefit of not
being suitable for nuclear weapons.
By combining Australia’s uranium
supply with the latest technology in
meltdown-proof reactors, the pebble
bed-MHTGR, and taking advantage
of our enormous coastline, Australia
could develop a network of power
plants that simultaneously produce
electricity, industrial heat, fresh water
through desalination, and the beginnings
of a hydrogen economy, in
which hydrogen takes over from oil
as the primary resource.
This will then set Australia up for
the next step in energy technology—nuclear fusion, which will generate
much greater amounts of energy
than even fission, by replicating the
same nuclear reaction which occurs
in the sun. The advent of fusion energy
opens up enormous technological
opportunities, including the production
of man-made resources as
mined resources run short. One brilliant
invention that has already been
patented, waiting for the development
of nuclear fusion, is called the
fusion torch: a super-heated plasma
furnace attached to a fusion reactor,
into which all the daily garbage of a
city can be dumped, where the material
at the atomic level will become
disassociated into its component atoms,
and spat out as pure elements
of the component atoms—silicon,
iron, etc..
This is an optimistic vision of the
future of mankind, for which our
children can be excited. This will
recapture the dream of conquering
space, whilst simultaneously
solving the economic problems on
earth. It will create a future in which
the sacredness of human life will be
honoured and preserved. It is this,
not the genocide of the oligarchy,
which is mankind’s true destiny.
Source: “The Surprising Benefits of Creating a Star.” U.S. Department of Energy, 2001.
This diagram of a fusion tokamak reactor shows the magnets, the
magnetic field lines, and the charged particles of plasma that follow the
magnetic field lines, spiralling around the tokamak. The magnetic field
“contains” the plasma where the fusion takes place, at temperatures
of 100 million degrees C. or more.
Source: Bernard J. Eastlund and William C. Gough, “The Fusion Torch: Closing the Cycle from Use to Reuse,” Washington, D.C.: Atomic Energy Commission, May 15, 1969 (WASH-1132).
With fusion torches (also called high-temperature plasma torches), we
will be able to process and separate any material—low-grade ores,
waste, sea water, or anything else—into its component atomic species,
obtaining pure isotopes from an arbitrary feedstock, making possible
almost 100% recycling of materials.
|