Home

A federally-registered independent political party

Follow the CEC on Facebook Follow @cecaustralia on Twitter Follow the CEC on Google +


Follow the CEC on Soundcloud












After Health Vote, Will Congress Survive the Mass Strike?

November 22, 2009 (LPAC)—Saturday night the Senate voted to proceed to consideration of Obama's Nazi health care reform, but that consideration will actually take place over an extended period of time which includes at least two lengthy recesses, for the Thanksgiving and the Christmas holidays.

Apparently the congress still fails to show any real comprehension of the mass strike that Lyndon LaRouche identified this past August. The hatred of the American public for Obama and his Nazi reform has substantially increased over the past months, and will show itself, in possibly unpredictable ways, during the coming period.

LaRouchePAC organizers across the nation have reported the already increased anger of the population since the release of the killer mammogram study. Field reports from Pennsylvania today indicate people coming up to us to say, "I am a cancer survivor,— I would be dead if these guidelines had been in effect," and "I know four cancer survivors." Others were saying, "I was furious with you for putting the mustache on Obama, but LaRouche is right."

It is not being missed, that as we have reported, if either the House or the Senate bill had been made into law by this time, as Obama had intended, then the genocidal U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations against mammograms would be the law of the land today.

One of the strongest examples of this recognition, is a column on the Advanceweb blogsite, by Valerie M. Chapman, a pediatric nurse and breast cancer survivor from Medford, N.J. Chapman reports that at age 43, her cancer was detected by a routine mammogram, and successfully treated. "My life was saved," she writes. "So, when the new guidelines came out on Nov. 16, I was horrified, stunned, angry and scared for myself and all American women. The ugly and painful truth is that the USPSTF does not think the cost is worth it to save one woman. As one woman whose life was spared by a screening mammogram, I can tell you: American women are not statistics. Each and every woman is of immense worth and value, and we will not have our lives marginalized by decision analysis. If the USPSTF guidelines were to become the standard of care, I am frightened for the lives of all American women, thousands of whom would likely die due to lack of access to preventive mammography services."

A column along the same line also appears in Huffington Post, by writer Jenny Block, who reports that because of a routine mammography, her mother is alive and well, today. "No 'committee' can refute that story or its bottom-line," she writes. "If it weren't for that mammogram, my mother would be dead." As did Chapman, Block notes that mammograms cost money, money that insurance companies and government programs don't want to pay, for "just a handful of women saved as a result." "Mammography," she writes, "made it possible for my mother to be at my wedding. If there's a way to stop the suffering, why wouldn't we?"


Citizens Electoral Council © 2016
Best viewed at 1024x768.
Please provide technical feedback to webadmin@cecaust.com.au
All electoral content is authorised by National Secretary, Craig Isherwood, 595 Sydney Rd, Coburg VIC 3058.